![]() ![]() ![]() With respect to Disney’s claims that Redbox was liable for contributory infringement, Judge Pregerson again noted that Disney was at fault for fundamentally tying physical media to digital download codes, holding that “Disney’s copyrights do not give it the power to prevent consumers from selling or otherwise transferring the Blu-ray discs or DVDs contained within Combo Packs.” In Judge Pregerson’s view, Disney’s requirement that owners of a physical disc are the only people that can use digital download codes also means that consumers can’t access the digital movie derived from that code unless they give away their right to resell the physical disc. ![]() Other language included on Disney’s boxes stated that “this product cannot be resold or rented individually.” However, Judge Pregerson noted, correctly, that this is legally incorrect - the First Sale doctrine gives a customer the right to resell copyrighted matter that they legally purchases, regardless of whether the copyright owner wants them to or not. Judge Pregerson ruled that merely including the language “codes are not for sale or transfer” on the disc’s box didn’t create a binding contract. Judge Pregerson held that Disney’s tying of physical disc ownership and digital download codes was inconsistent with the copyright law’s First Sale Doctrine. Copyright Misuse occurs when the copyright holder is abusing their copyright, and applies to prevent the copyright holder from enforcing the copyright. Disney requires consumers “represent” that they own the physical disc that accompanied the download code in order to access the digital movie provided by the digital code.įederal judge Dean Pregerson recently ruled against Disney in this case, rationalizing his decision with the somewhat obscure doctrine of Copyright Misuse. A further claim Disney brought against Redbox was that Redbox is encouraging end-users to infringe on Disney copyrights, thus being liable under the doctrine of contributory infringement. Indeed, the products come affixed with the language “codes are not for sale or transfer.” Disney’s argument, essentially, was that Redbox had to agree to the terms of that condition in order to un-package the products and gain access to the digital code to begin with. However, Redbox also began reselling the digital codes packaged in its purchases directly to consumers.Īs you could probably imagine, Disney did not take too kindly to this, suing Redbox for copyright infringement - specifically for violating the licensing terms that accompany the purchase of these disc-and-code bundles dubbed “Combo Packs.” Disney argued that the physical disc and the digital code are not two separate products, but rather offered together as one product for customer convenience. Redbox would then allow consumers to rent the physical media discs, as it always has. Thus, Redbox purchased Disney Blu-Rays and DVDs, coupled with digital codes. Redbox has viewed these disc-and-code bundles as two separate products. This allows you to watch the movie on your computer, phone, tablet, video game console, or TV-streaming-box. When you buy a Blu-ray or DVD (why are you still buying DVDs? It’s 2018!) from Disney, it comes bundled with a piece of paper inside, affixed with a special code allowing you to download a digital copy of that same movie on and. Redbox, the popular movie-rental terminals outside of your local grocery store, has begun reselling download codes for popular movies, including Disney’s Beauty and the Beast, Frozen, and its three newest Star Wars films. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |